Ethereum reclaims $2,000 as spot etfs return to net inflows after heavy selling

Ethereum has clawed back the critical $2,000 price zone as spot ETH ETFs in the United States finally flipped back to net inflows, offering a rare hint of optimism after weeks of heavy selling pressure.

On February 13, Ethereum spot exchange-traded funds collectively attracted $10.26 million in fresh capital, snapping a two-day stretch of aggressive redemptions that had totaled $242.28 million. This return to positive flows coincided with a sharp 5.8% jump in ETH’s price over 24 hours, lifting the asset from an intraday low below $1,930 to trade between $1,926.66 and $2,067.44 and ultimately reclaim the $2,000 level.

ETF flows show first signs of stabilization

The renewed demand was led by Grayscale’s mini Ethereum trust, which alone pulled in $14.51 million on the day. VanEck’s ETHV fund followed with $3.00 million in net inflows, while Fidelity’s FETH added another $2.04 million. These gains were enough to turn the daily balance positive, but they have not yet fully reversed the broader trend of institutional selling.

Over the week ending February 13, Ethereum ETFs still registered a significant $161.15 million in net outflows. February 11 marked the most severe one-day withdrawal of the period, with $129.18 million in redemptions, followed closely by February 12, which saw another $113.10 million exit the products. Only February 9 and 10 temporarily broke the selling streak, bringing a combined $70.87 million in inflows ($57.05 million and $13.82 million respectively).

This pattern underscores a key dynamic: while short bursts of dip-buying are emerging, a meaningful portion of institutional capital remains in de-risking mode after Ethereum’s prolonged drawdown.

Longer-term performance still under pressure

Despite the daily rebound, Ethereum’s performance over longer timeframes remains deeply negative. As of February 13:

– Over 7 days, ETH is still down 1.2%.
– Across 14 days, losses deepen to 23.7%.
– Over the past 30 days, Ethereum has dropped 37.5%.
– Year-on-year, ETH is lower by 24.4%.

This context matters for ETF flows. Many institutional investors entered or scaled positions when ETH traded well above current levels, including the period when prices were north of $3,000. As a result, recent market structure reflects not just profit-taking, but in many cases forced or strategic de-risking in response to portfolio drawdowns and risk limits.

A month of heavy redemptions

The latest weekly outflows continue a pattern that has been building since late January. For the week ending February 6, Ethereum ETFs saw $165.82 million in net redemptions. The previous week, ending January 30, was even harsher with $326.93 million flowing out. The week ending January 23 marked the peak of selling so far, with a massive $611.17 million pulled from ETH products, coinciding with Ethereum’s slide from above $3,000 to below $2,000.

In other words, even though the $2,000 level has been temporarily recovered, the ETF data shows that the market is still working through the aftershocks of that steep correction. A single positive day of flows is encouraging, but not yet evidence of a full sentiment reversal.

Trading activity ticks higher

Trading activity in Ethereum ETFs also picked up alongside the price rebound. Total value traded on February 13 climbed to $1.10 billion, up from $880.33 million the day before. Rising turnover in tandem with positive price action suggests that buyers are returning in greater size, even as some participants continue to exit.

Higher volumes can be a double-edged sword: they often accompany both capitulation and early stages of recovery. For now, the balance of evidence shows that selling has moderated, but not fully disappeared.

Bitcoin ETFs see modest inflows amid volatility

Bitcoin products also experienced a shift in flows, though on a more muted scale compared with recent turbulence. On February 13, spot Bitcoin ETFs posted $15.20 million in net inflows. Fidelity’s FBTC led the day with $11.99 million in new capital.

Grayscale’s mini BTC trust added $6.99 million, VanEck’s HODL brought in $1.95 million, and WisdomTree’s BTCW saw $3.64 million of inflows. Offsetting some of this demand, BlackRock’s flagship IBIT recorded $9.36 million in outflows, marking its third day of redemptions in just four trading sessions.

The positive daily figure is particularly notable because it followed a sharp two-day exodus: between February 11 and 12, Bitcoin ETFs suffered a combined $686.67 million in outflows. This mirrors Ethereum’s pattern of aggressive selling followed by a short-term reversal, suggesting that broader crypto risk appetite remains fragile but reactive to price levels and perceived bargains.

Why the $2,000 level matters for Ethereum

The recovery of the $2,000 mark is more than just a round number milestone. Psychologically and technically, this zone has acted as a pivot in previous cycles, often separating deeper corrective phases from attempts at consolidation or trend reversals.

For many systematic and discretionary investors, $2,000 serves as:

– A reference point for risk management, triggering either re-entry or further de-risking.
– A key level for options positioning and hedging strategies, which can create feedback loops in volatility.
– A benchmark for relative value versus Bitcoin and other large-cap digital assets.

Reclaiming this level after dipping under $1,930 in the same session signals that buyers are still willing to defend ETH when prices approach perceived “value” territory, even amid persistent ETF outflows over the broader timeframe.

What ETF flows reveal about institutional sentiment

ETF flow data is one of the clearest windows into institutional behavior because these products are designed for regulated, large-scale capital. The recent pattern in Ethereum ETFs suggests a few important takeaways:

1. Capitulation may be slowing, not ending
The sharpest weekly outflows aligned with the most violent leg of the price correction from above $3,000 to below $2,000. Since then, the size of weekly redemptions, while still substantial, has been gradually shrinking, and brief inflow days have started to appear more frequently.

2. Short-term traders vs. long-term allocators
Some flows likely reflect shorter-term tactical positioning: buying dips after large selloffs, then trimming exposure on rebounds. Longer-term allocators tend to move slower, and their behavior may become clearer only if ETH holds above $2,000 for an extended period or begins to reclaim higher resistance levels.

3. Bottom formation is a process, not a moment
The mix of heavy multi-week redemptions and sudden single-day inflows is characteristic of markets attempting to find a floor. Often, ETFs will show alternating patterns of selling and buying as participants recalibrate exposure to new price realities.

Key risks and potential catalysts ahead

From here, Ethereum’s trajectory will likely be shaped by a combination of macro and crypto-native drivers:

Macro environment: Interest rate expectations, inflation data, and broader risk-on / risk-off swings in global markets will influence demand for risk assets, including ETH and BTC.
Regulatory tone: Any changes in regulatory clarity around ETFs, staking, or DeFi could significantly affect institutional willingness to hold Ethereum exposure.
On-chain activity and fundamentals: Network usage, transaction fees, staking participation, and development activity in the Ethereum ecosystem can either support or undermine the investment case, especially for long-term holders.
Derivatives positioning: Large expiries in options and futures can amplify moves around key strike levels, particularly near psychologically important prices like $2,000.

If Ethereum can maintain support above $2,000 while ETF outflows continue to shrink or stabilize, it would strengthen the argument that the market is transitioning from forced selling to base-building.

How traders and investors might interpret the data

For short-term traders, the combination of a strong daily bounce, revived ETF inflows, and increased trading volumes suggests an environment ripe for volatility-driven strategies. Range trading around the $2,000 mark, momentum plays on breakout attempts, and options strategies tied to this psychological level are all likely to remain popular.

For longer-term investors, the focus is less on daily flows and more on trend shifts. They may look for:

– A sustained series of ETF inflow days rather than isolated one-off spikes.
– Evidence that weekly net flows are moving from deep negative territory toward flat or positive.
– Confirmation that Ethereum’s price stops making new local lows, even on days of broader market weakness.

Until these conditions are more clearly met, many allocators may remain cautious, adding only gradually or waiting for more compelling risk-reward setups.

Ethereum vs. Bitcoin: diverging but connected narratives

The comparison between Ethereum and Bitcoin ETF flows reveals both divergence and interdependence. Bitcoin has generally been viewed as the primary macro hedge and entry point for institutions, while Ethereum is often treated as a higher-beta, more innovation-driven asset with additional layers of complexity, such as staking and smart contracts.

The modest $15.20 million net inflow into Bitcoin ETFs on February 13, following nearly $687 million in outflows over the prior two days, reflects a similar pattern: strong reactions to price weakness followed by cautious re-engagement. This parallel behavior indicates that, despite different narratives, institutional sentiment toward the entire crypto complex remains synchronized to a significant degree.

Outlook: cautious optimism, but proof still needed

The return of net inflows to Ethereum ETFs and the reclaiming of the $2,000 price level are meaningful data points, but they come against the backdrop of weeks of intense selling and sizable losses across all major timeframes. For now, the market appears to be in a fragile equilibrium:

– Sellers are no longer completely in control, as evidenced by positive daily flows and sharp intraday recoveries.
– Buyers are emerging opportunistically at lower levels, but sustained conviction has yet to fully return.
– Key support at $2,000 has been retaken, but must hold through future bouts of volatility to confirm its strength.

In the coming weeks, the interaction between ETF flows, price behavior around $2,000, and broader macro sentiment will likely determine whether this rebound evolves into a durable recovery or proves to be just another temporary relief rally in a longer consolidation phase.